Welcome to

Capitol News Service

Florida's Best Political Television Coverage


Visit the Lobby Tools Website


Visit Legislative IQ Website


Recent Posts



RSS Capitol News LIVE

RSS Quote of the Day

  • Jim Rohn
    "It is the set of the sails, not the direction of the wind that determines which way we will go."
  • Oswald Chambers
    "The whole point of getting things done is knowing what to leave undone."
  • Maya Angelou
    "There's a world of difference between truth and facts. Facts can obscure the truth."
  • Laura Ingalls Wilder
    "Home is the nicest word there is."


October 27th, 2006 by flanews

Voters are being asked to decide this election whether Florida needs a new legislative task force to plan out the future use of your tax dollars.  Jeb Bush says Amendment 1 would put an important long-range outlook for state spending into Florida’s constitution.  But even supporters have some concerns about whether we really need another task force.Jeb Bush won’t be in office next spring when lawmakers craft what will likely be about an 80-billion dollar state budget.  But he’s a big supporter of a proposed Constitutional Amendment to limit the amount of one-time money the legislature can use for ongoing state costs.

“The problem with state governments across the country is they use non-recurring money to spend on recurring obligations,” Bush said.  “When the non-recurring money goes away, they say oh, we need to raise taxes.  This puts a limit on that availability.”

If Amendment 1 passes, lawmakers could only use up to 3 percent of one-time money for ongoing expenses.  They’d have to take a vote if they wanted to raise that limit.

Dominic Calabro heads the fiscally-conservative watchdog group TaxWatch.  He says the 3-percent limit doesn’t go far enough.

“We think you should use zero percent of one-time, non-recurring revenue for recurring expenses,” Calabro said.  “Otherwise, it’s fiscal mischief.” 

The Amendment would also create a Government efficiency task force to develop a long-range financial plan for the state.  Opponents argue the amendment really isn’t necessary as long as lawmakers do their job.

Lawmakers voted to put Amendment 1 on the ballot back in 2004, saying the state needs to do a better job of future financial planning.  If Amendment 1 doesn’t pass, current budget laws that were originally proposed by the Taxation and Budget Reform Commission and approved by voters in 1992 will remain in place. 

Posted in State News | 2 Comments »

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

copyright © 2016 by Capitol News Service | Powered by Wordpress | Hosted by LyonsHost.com