Welcome to

Governor Rick Scott has once again reassigned a case from Orange-Osceola State Attorney Aramis Ayala citing her opposition to the death penalty as the reason.

The latest case is that of Everett Glenn Miller.

Miller is accused of murdering two Kissimmee police officers during a routine traffic stop Friday night. The case falls under the jurisdiction of State Attorney Aramis Ayala who announced in March she would not seek the death penalty in any case. Ayala believes Florida’s death penalty laws are unconstitutional.

Governor Scott has since removed 27 cases from Ayala’s jurisdiction and handed them over to State Attorney Brad King.

Ayala has sued Governor Scott in the Florida Supreme Court claiming he over stepped his authority by interfering with the will of a publicly elected official.

“By taking 24 cases away from State Attorney Aramis Ayala Governor Scott violated the constitution and the law,” Ayala’s lawyer Roy Austin Jr. said in court earlier this month.

The Governor’s attorneys argue the Governor has the authority to transfer cases in the interest of justice.

“If petitioner’s policy is allowed to stand we’re going to have a situation where you have law free zones with respect to some statues in some parts of the state,” said Soliciter General Amit Agarwal.

In a statement, Governor Scott justified his decision in the most recent transfer by saying, “In Florida we have zero tolerance for violence and those who attack law enforcement.”

The Florida Police Chiefs Association agrees.

The organization says death needs to be on the table when a cop is killed.

“We appreciate the support that they give to law enforcement. We also believe that every option should be on the table when trying to work through the justice system with a cop killer,” said Amy Mercer, the Executive Director of the Association.

There is no time table for the Supreme Court to Release it’s decision.

The Court its normal opinion releases on August 31st.

We reached out to Aramis Ayala’s office for comment on this story, did not receive a response in time.

Since 2008, annual increases on property taxes for businesses and rental properties have been capped at 10%.

Previously taxes were left to the will of the market meaning property owners were vulnerable to extreme tax spikes.

“Well I think it’s just the fear that it could happen I think that’s more than anything. Rents do go up and property taxes do go up,” said James Miller, Communications Director with the Florida Retail Federation.

The cap goes away in 2019.

But support is growing for a proposed constitutional amendment that would make the 10% cap permanent.

The Florida Retail Federation says permanent caps will benefit Florida’s businesses and renters.

“It enables the state to remain strong and vibrant and get people their business here and move their business here and that’s really ultimately what you want,” said Miller.

Some organizations like the AFLCIO say the state can’t afford the loss of revenue a permanent cap would create.

Rich Templin, Legislative Director for the organization says Florida is the 49th in support for public services.

With most of the cost picked up by lower income groups.

“We have relied over the last decade on bumper sticker type polices which just isn’t sound financial policy.,” said Templin.

Tempin says although the tax cut may sound good on paper, Floridian’s will pay the price if services are cut.

“Florida does not generate the revenue that it could easily generate because our revenue policy is a hodgepodge of exemptions, loopholes, caps and what that’s done is it’s essentially starving the programming that Floridians really need,” said Templin.

Supporters of the amendment say the state has nothing to lose, as the caps have already been in place for 8 years.

The cap on residential homeowners is already set 3%.